Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Chapters Douglas

Developments in Solway Harvester inquest bid

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2008
MOVES to force Solway Harvester owner Richard Gidney give evidence at an inquest into the tragedy have taken a step forward.
The boat sank in rough seas off the coast of the Isle of Man in January 2000 claiming the lives of skipper Andrew Craig Mills, 29, David Mills, 18, Robin Mills, 33, Martin Hugh Milligan, 26, John Doyle Murphy, 22, Wesley John Jolly and David Joseph Lyons, both 17.

The tragedy devastated the close-knit fishing community in the Isle of Whithorn.

The inquest opened after the Manx Government paid £1 million to recover the bodies and the vessel from the seabed, but was adjourned for legal proceedings.

Mr Gidney stood trial for manslaughter of the crew in 2005 but the case collapsed after the court ruled there was no case to answer.

When the inquest resumed in November 2006 he refused to attend.

A petition from Coroner Michael Moyle submitted to the Court of Session in Edinburgh asking for help to obtain Mr Gidney's evidence was granted on February 15 this year.

Last month representatives from the Scottish Sheriff's Office in Edinburgh boarded the wreck, which remains in Douglas harbour.

On Wednesday it was announced that Sheriff Principal Lockhart, the Sheriff Principal of South Strathclyde, Dumfries and Galloway, had set the initial date for the commencement of the proceedings.

It is understood an order has been served on Mr Gidney in a bid to get him to attend.

Procedural issues will be dealt with on June 9 with the hearing scheduled to run from June 23 to 27.

The matter will be heard at Kirkcudbright Sheriff Court in Scotland.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 April 2008 5:04 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Isle of Man
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Civil servants are to get a lump sum payment of £200 after a union successfully took this year's pay freeze to arbitration. But government claims it could cause job losses. Is it the right decision?
Yes. It is only fair and the £450,000 cost is not that significant.
No. There are plenty of other things that money could go to and what about those with pay freezes in the private sector.
Don't know. It's only fair if you're not one of those who loses their job as a result.


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.